Concurring Opinion Writing on the U.S. Supreme Court Professor Vladimir LadizhanskyAnalysis of concurrent opinion writing by Supreme Court justices. When justices write or join a concurring opinion, they demonstrate their preferences over substantive legal rules. Concurrences provide a way for justices to express their views about the law, to engage in a dialogue of law with each other, the legal community, the public, and Congress. This important study is the first systematic examination of the content of Supreme Court
as well as to Media Studies and Adaptation Studies
Hanash’s years on the job have made him intimately familiar with the city’s seedy underbelly
ultimately political institutions as they constitute the transforming Japanese state
Salisbury was a founding figure in the development of ancient Near Eastern
A comprehensive introduction to Islam
In recent years our understanding of these diseases has greatly benefited from access to low-cost sequencing technologies which have revolutionized virus discovery
Despite integrated pest management (IPM) practices being taught and researched for over six decades
subsidised places and student loan schemes
especially regarding the wider adoption of agroforestry and its up- and out-scaling
Through an ethnohistorical study of the Nagas-a congeries of tribes inhabiting the Indo-Myanmar frontier-this book explores an unusually interesting region of India that is all too often seen as peripheral
Scholars and practitioners from the realm of 'Islamic architecture’ consider its changing nature and continued significance
Model quality depends on accuracy of modelling decisions and quality of the obtained data
